Interested in contributing to the Invenio project? There are lots of ways to help.
Code of conduct
Overall, we’re open, considerate, respectful and good to each other. We contribute to this community not because we have to, but because we want to. If we remember that, our Code of Conduct will come naturally.
Get in touch
See Link. Don’t hesitate to get in touch with the Invenio maintainers. The maintainers can help you kick start your contribution.
Types of contributions¶
Found a bug? Want a new feature? Open a GitHub issue on the applicable repository and get the conversation started (do search if the issue has already been reported). Not sure exactly where, how, or what to do? See Link.
Found a security issue? Alert us privately at firstname.lastname@example.org, this will allow us to distribute a security patch before potential attackers look at the issue.
Found a typo? You can edit the file and submit a pull request directly on GitHub.
Debugged something for hours? Spare others time by writing up a short troubleshooting piece on https://github.com/inveniosoftware/troubleshooting/.
Wished you knew earlier what you know now? Help write both non-technical and technical topical guides.
Need help getting started? See our Quickstart.
Need help setting up your editor? See our Setting up your system guide which helps your automate the tedious tasks.
Want to refactor APIs? Get in touch with the maintainers and get the conversation started.
Style guide (TL;DR)¶
Travis CI is our style police officer who will check your pull request against most of our Style guide, so do make sure you get a green light from him.
ProTip: Make sure your editor is setup to do checking, linting, static analysis etc. so you don’t have to think. Need help setting up your editor? See Setting up your system.
Commit message is first and foremost about the content. You are communicating with fellow developers, so be clear and brief.
(Inspired by How to Write a Git Commit Message)
Indicate the component follow by a short description
ProTip: Really! Spend some time to ensure your editor is top tuned. It will pay off many-fold in the long run. See Setting up your system.
component: summarize changes in 50 char or less * More detailed explanatory text, if necessary. Formatted using bullet points, preferably `*`. Wrapped to 72 characters. * Explain the problem that this commit is solving. Focus on why you are making this change as opposed to how (the code explains that). Are there side effects or other unintuitive consequences of this change? Here's the place to explain them. * The blank line separating the summary from the body is critical (unless you omit the body entirely); various tools like `log`, `shortlog` and `rebase` can get confused if you run the two together. * Use words like "Adds", "Fixes" or "Breaks" in the listed bullets to help others understand what you did. * If your commit closes or addresses an issue, you can mention it in any of the bullets after the dot. (closes #XXX) (addresses #YYY) Co-authored-by: John Doe <email@example.com>
Git signature: The only signature we use is
Co-authored-by (see above)
to provide credit to co-authors. Previously we required a
signature, however this is no longer required.
Need help making your first pull request? Check out the GitHub guide Forking Projects.
When making your pull request, please keep the following in mind:
Create logically separate commits for logically separate things.
Include tests and don’t decrease test coverage.
Do write documentation. We all love well-documented frameworks, right?
Run tests locally using
Make sure you have the rights if you include third-party code (and do credit the original creator). Note, you cannot include GPL or AGPL licensed code. LGPL and other more permissive open source license or fine.
Green light on all GitHub status checks is required in order to merge your PR.
Work in progress (WIP)
Do publish your code as pull request sooner than later. Just prefix the pull
request title with
WIP (=work in progress) if it is not quite ready.
Allow edits from maintainers
To speed up the integration process, it helps if on GitHub you allow maintainers to edit your pull request so they can fix small issues autonomously.
A pull request will probably be reviewed by someone in a different location, maybe even a different time zone. Therefore, avoiding blockings and misunderstandings is key. The following ideas could help ease and speed up the review process:
Be clear when something is ready to be reviewed (see WIP above).
If a PR requires changes, say so explicitly, but politely (use emojis!).
When something is ready to be merged say it explicitly. If the reviewer does not have permission to merge, (s)he should ping the corresponding person.
When reviewing, rate your comments. This would help to understand if a comment must be addressed (e.g. it has substantial implications) or it is something the reviewer thought of but is a matter of “take it or leave it”. A proposed scale is: 1. Comment/Doubt/Question: exactly that. A doubt, a question or a comment. 2. Minor: a change that the reviewer thinks might need change. However, it is not blocking, it is up to the developer to choose if and how to change it. It can be merged! 3. Moderate/Normal (Default): a change that requires further discussion (e.g. breaking changes). It cannot be merged, unless explicitly stated by the reviewer (e.g. choose a solution proposed by the reviewer and implement it). Depending on the nature of the change a new review might be needed, use common sense. 4. Major: a change that needs further discussion, probably a chat. Even the opinion of an architect. It has high implications. It cannot be merged. 5. Shelved: a suggestion that will be treated later on as part of a different issue. It is a good practice to reference the issue. Note that any of the previous (comment, minor, moderate and major) can be shelved if agreed by the PR creator and the reviewer.
Here is an example:
minor: I think this variable name should be plural since it refers to a list.
If no level is given, assume it is of “moderate” level within reason (might clearly be minor or major). GitHub suggestions for instance are typically minor, so no need to tag them all the time.
Following these guidelines builds trust over time. As a reviewer, you know your comments will be heard and as a submitter, you know someone has taken the time to go over your work and help you solve the problem you were tackling. In both cases, it’s done in a friendly and efficient manner.